Monday 14 June 2010

No 9868, Monday 14 Jun 10 Nita Jaggi

ACROSS
1   - Sweet milk pudding (10) - BLANCMANGE [E]
9   - Jaundice colour (6) - YELLOW [E]
10 - A diplomat of the highest rank (10) - AMBASSADOR [E]
11 - Tick in a party (6) - {IN}{SECT}
12 - Try to finally get into the team for physical training (7) - {AT{T}EM*}{PT}
16 - Cracked wood refuse (5) - TRASH [DD] 
17 - Irritate the angry killer out of the borders of Kurnool (4) - RILEkl*
18 - Softly encourage the witch hunt (5) - {P}{URGE}
19 - Extra words to say to a stunner very much in the Russian city (5) - {PS}{KO}{V}
20 - First take out fully uncooked food (4) - {T}{O}{F}{U}
21 - Woman likes the bread in New York (5) - {NAN}{NY}
22 - Double-crosser will touch gold (7) - {TRAIT}{OR}
27 - It may be felt at the time of an earthquake (6) - TREMOR [CD]
29 - Oh! Aunt is too occupied not being in town (10) - OUTSTATION* An extra T appears?
30 - Nab the local kind of rogue initially (6) - {COLLA*}{R}
31 - Release an oriental worker in Channel Islands exactly at eight (10) - {E}{MAN}{CI}{PAT}{E}
DOWN
2   - Hold out the cold fog light (4) - cLAMP 
3   - Suggestion for a new University can anyhow be executed initially (6) - {N}{U}{ANC*}{E}
4   - An unlucky accident (6) - MISHAP [CD]
5   - Indicate the layer first set on the lumps (5) - {NOD}{E}{S}
6   - Bird's nest in an apartment (5) - EYRIE [DD]
7   - Lawyer you first employ in case for the sailor (4,6) - {BL}{U}{E} {JACKET}
8   - Change around the thrice vows exchanged (10) - SWITCHOVER*
12 - Let son pack out the new staff (10) - ALPENSTOCK*
13 - Whirling dance with the sailor (10) - {TAR}ANTELLA ?
14 - Division of soldiers (5) - TROOP [E]
15 - Regularly call for an old-fashioned garment (5) - {C}{L}{OUT}
23 - Simple country woman (6) - RUSTIC [E]
24 - At home, pets are raised in conformity with the environment (6) - {IN}{STEP<-}
25 - Very cold for an immature tree toad again (5) - {FROg}{RE} New word for me
26 - Father has tea with one going back to an Indian city (5) - {PA}{T}{NA<-}
28 - A victim of ridicule (4) - LOUT [CD] ?

88 comments:

  1. 28d: I think GOAT may be more apt.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With a lot of fretting, brain-racking, guessing etc. I managed to complete the puzzle today. Clueless about a few annos. Mr Guesswork zindabad!

    Some like BLANCMANGE, YELLOW, AMBASSADOR, OUTSTATION, EMANCIPATE and some others were easy, though.

    29A - an extra T

    19A - The first words for a stunner that came to mind were OOH LA LA but didn't fit in. Googled for PSKOV. Absolutely no idea about the anno.

    Btw, Ooh la la reminded me of the song from the Tamil movie Minsara Kanavu (1997), sung by Unni Menon, KS Chitra and others, under the baton of the one and only AR Rahman. (Hindi version: Sapnay)

    13D - I took it as TARANTELLA depending on crossings. Is it also spelt as TARANTELLE?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 28D - My guess too was GOAT, as in SCAPEGOAT also.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LNS: Col. may also not like this becoming a Biggles blog (what say, Sir?). Hence, my last comment on Biggles: As per Biggles goes to School and some other early life books, he is supposed to have been born in India and well versed in Hindi.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Richard: 28d More so in the nature of getting somebody's goat. Translation in Hindi: Bakra !

    ReplyDelete
  6. 29a: What is the significance of Oh!. Is it superficial?

    ReplyDelete
  7. CV - 27A - Read about the minor tremors in Chennai and other places on Sunday morning. Gopalapuram is mentioned. Hope everything is OK.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bakra indeed ! :-)

    17 A "..killer out of the borders of Kurnool".

    more like one has to take out the borders of Kurnool out of the killer. Is this a normal way of clue construction?

    ReplyDelete
  9. 16A could be BRASH also, I think

    ReplyDelete
  10. PSKOV - Post script Knock Out V

    ReplyDelete
  11. Giridhar @ 08:50

    It took me also a long time to take KL from KILLER and then jumble.



    4D - An unlucky accident (6) - MISHAP [CD]

    'An unfortunate accident' would have been more appropriate. I guess 'unlucky' if referred to persons.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry the previous post was a question. I wasn't sure whether I understood it correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Giridhar @ 09:00 - thanks for PSKOV anno.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Correction to my 09:01 post:

    '....I guess 'unlucky' is referred to persons.'

    ReplyDelete
  15. 6 D What is the link to apartment, unless it was probably 50+ stories?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Of this crossword, ace solver Bhavan mentioned elsewhere: "Sloppy construction at its worst."

    How nice it would be if we were doing a UK crossword and discussing its intricacy and beauty rather than raising questions of this kind.

    Take 19a. There 'much' cannot be regarded as a connector at all. It does not have any role to play and the compiler is not up to writing a publishable clue for that word. Similarly, in 17a the deletion of KL from KILLER is not indicated properly. 29a: what is the anagram fodder? Is a letter deficient or is a letter redundant? We can go on like this.
    If a clue cannot lead to an intended answer, it does not lead to the answer. We can't say 'this the compiler intended, let me put it in'. That is not crossword solving.
    If there is any mistake here, the compiler owes us a word of apology.

    ReplyDelete
  17. For RUSTIC, the clue is "Simple country woman".

    Leave alone the compiler's deficiency in coming out with a cryptic clue (thank god, it is not called THE HINDU CRYPTIC CROSSWORD), is this acceptable even as a straightforward/quick/easy clue?

    Is the def as given acceptable? Will the usagists around here give their opinions?

    ReplyDelete
  18. 8 Change around the thrice vows exchanged (10)

    Is this English?

    ReplyDelete
  19. As I mentioned in the Orkut blog, I was delighted to see Kurnool in the clues, for I was born and raised there. As a result, today, at least today, I won't be angry at any blunders Nita committed, even the egregious kind. Boy! Am I easy to please or what!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. 10 A diplomat of the highest rank (10) AMBASSADOR

    Is this factually correct? Mind you, I am not saying it is incorrect. I am only asking if it is right. Is there no one above an Ambassador in diplomacy?

    ReplyDelete
  21. CV: as you note:
    23D: The gender is superfluous
    8a: Words strung up in a meaningless way

    ReplyDelete
  22. Has someone worked out the percentages of cryptic clues and straightforward clues in this crossword?

    ReplyDelete
  23. CV: 10a; I too wondered the same. Would have prefered ' A diplomatic Indian car' instead

    ReplyDelete
  24. 9a: Jaundice colour

    - Is the use of English here correct?

    ReplyDelete
  25. 12a : ATTEMPT

    Can someone carefully work out the intended anno?

    ReplyDelete
  26. CV,

    What about Cracked wood refuse?

    Kishore - your clue is far better :-)

    ReplyDelete
  27. 16a Cracked wood refuse (5) TRASH

    Is this a DD as the Col has said? If so, can someone show me the distinct defs?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Giridhar
    I had not seen your post when I was typing the above. Other questions follow in logical order.

    ReplyDelete
  29. 12 A Should probably have had some rearrange indicator for TEAM?

    12 D What is 'new' doing in the clue?

    ReplyDelete
  30. 18a: Does a witch hunt necessarily involve PURGE? Can there be a PURGE without any witch hunt?

    ReplyDelete
  31. 21 NANNY

    What is the role of 'like' in the clue? Connector? If so, what is a connector in a clue and what is flab? Explain.

    ReplyDelete
  32. CV 18a: Purge caused by purgatives is without a witchhunt !

    ReplyDelete
  33. In 2d, we remove C from CLAMP. OK, but what is def for LAMP? Fog light? Is 'fog' really necessary?

    ReplyDelete
  34. 21 I got to NANNY as N ANN Y (NAN rearranged as ANN). NAAN is also a common spelling, but I know this composer goes with NAN. Shoudln't Indian bread be used instead of just bread ,for Roti, Naan, etc?

    CV
    Once I had NAN and NY, I didn't pay attention to 'likes'. Is 'woman' a good enough definition for Nanny?

    ReplyDelete
  35. The speed at which the comments go, implies that it may break the recent record of 70

    ReplyDelete
  36. CV
    Once I had NAN and NY, I didn't pay attention to 'likes'. Is 'woman' a good enough definition for Nanny?


    Since the query is addressed to CV...
    A nanny is a she-goat. Also a children's nurse or just 'nurse'. It is also a pet-name for a grandmother.

    'Woman', I think, is rather a vague def for NANNY.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think today's puzzle was all right. Yep, sorry I mean it.

    Well, this is supposed to be a cryptic crossword, and some of the common definitions of the word "cryptic" happen to be vague, obscure etc. Instead of being pedantic about the vagueness of clues, I think we oughta feel happy that we've still been able to figure out the intended answers (hopefully) and solve the puzzle.

    So, let's see the brighter side.

    ReplyDelete
  38. CV@9:58,

    In 2D, agreed fog is not really necessary but it is doing so harm by being there as we do have fog lights on all cars. In a way it is good NJ didn't write fog lamp and expect us to work out the answer as LAMP ;-0

    ReplyDelete
  39. CV@9:49,

    PURGE = PERSECUTE = WITCH-HUNT I see no harm there

    ReplyDelete
  40. CV@9:44

    TRASH = Something broken off or removed to be discarded, especially plant trimmings. = So CRACKED WOOD

    Excuse me for thinking like NJ, she doesn't need distinct defs.

    ReplyDelete
  41. CV@9:37

    Jaundice, (also known as icterus, attributive adjective: icteric) is a yellowish discoloration of the skin.

    So Jaundice colour seems ok.

    ReplyDelete
  42. To an extent I agree with VJ@10:40, though only for today's CW by NJ.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Deepak, is this for real??? Are you really defending NJ? OMG, purple haze comes to my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Col,

    I can't believe it! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yes, I know.
    Yet I don't accept the collocation "jaundice colour".
    "jaundiced colour" is OK. Not "jaundice colour". For me, this is not English.

    ReplyDelete
  46. You think I am against the compiler? I am for English!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Richard
    Thanks for your query above.
    No, I didn't feel any tremor, though Gopalpuram is adjacent to Royapettah mentioned in a newspaper report.
    During the tsunami of the past, I was in CA.
    Prior to that, on an occasion, I have felt the effects of a violent earthquake with its epicentre far off - the cot on which I lay shaking, something falling off the table, etc., but not during the latest episode.

    ReplyDelete
  48. VJ@10:55 and Giridhar@11:02

    I shall clarify,I only said 'to an extent' and further clarified it with 'only for today's CW', I suppose I felt so as I was able to figure out the answers without too much of a hitch today.

    As far as english, surface reading, grammar etc goes, when it comes to NJ's CW's I turn a blind eye to those aspects and 'bash on regardless'

    ReplyDelete
  49. Today's contributions to innovations in English:

    'Fully uncooked food' - remember a friend telling me once: 'My stomach is fully empty'.

    'Unlucky accident'

    Re: 'ambassador', I think there is a higher rank called 'Ambassador Plenipotentiary'. While I was in the Middle East, a close Arab acquaintance of mine was concurretly the host country's Ambassador Plenipotentiary to Algeria, while being envoy to Egypt. I am not sure if India has any such posts abroad.

    ReplyDelete
  50. 51 posts between 08:30 and 13:00 - none since.

    Lull before the storm?

    ReplyDelete
  51. Deepak, I was referring to your clarifications on the points Chaturvasi raised. I was surprised that you defended NJ's clues not once, not twice but thrice. lol

    ReplyDelete
  52. Richard, things are generally quiet around here this time of the day (11 AM to 6 PM like). I think posters here are following a strict "no crosswords during work" policy.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Jaggi-ji has inspired 54 comments. Brvo, Jaggi-ji!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Richard @ 12:52

    As per the sources below, 'Ambassador' is a short form of 'AP' and is the highest ranked diplomat.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ambassador
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomatic_rank

    ReplyDelete
  55. Richard (12:52) Googled "fully uncooked" and "unlucky accident." The first one got about 220 results and the second one, about 44000 results. So there's company.

    ReplyDelete
  56. 20A "'First' take out.."

    5D " ..layer 'first' set.."

    7D "...you 'first' employ

    'First' in 5D and 7D is used to indicate taking the first letter in the word following 'first'.

    However for 20 A, it indicates taking first letter in 'all' the following words (excluding the definition)to get TOFU.

    I think the word 'initially' (like 'regularly') is used for cases like 20 A if I am not mistaken?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Giridhar, not really. I think she uses "first" and "initially" interchangeably depending on the sentence/ surface. They could either mean taking out the first letter of just the next word or all successive words, though I've seen the word "first" used more often to indicate the latter.

    ReplyDelete
  58. It has been categorically stated that "today's puzzle was all right (sic)". So we can't be arguing any further.
    The fact that a certain expression gets so many hits in a Google search is not a fair indication that its uage is correct.
    Let me not be misunderstood. I am not talking about the crossword at all but about expressions that were brought up by Richard, a person who is punctilious when it comes to matters of usage.
    Food is 'cooked', 'partially cooked' or 'fully cooked'. I am not sure we can say food is 'fully uncooked'. Rice becomes food when it is cooked. When it is uncooked, it's just uncooked.
    There can be lucky, fortuitous accidents, but not 'unlucky accidents'.
    This is what I think.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Please ignore inadvertent typos.

    ReplyDelete
  60. VJ,

    I was thinking about an accepted usage in general across the setters universe. Are you saying that NJ alone uses 'first' to mean different things?

    ReplyDelete
  61. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Giridhar, my post was in reference to this particular setter's crosswords. Don't know about the universal standards.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Thank you, VJ.
    I am sorry I misunderstood you.
    So long as we are agreed that Google results cannot be considered authoritative, it's fine.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Chaturvasi, I think you got me wrong. I merely said "there's company." I never implied that those expressions were right. It amazes me that google throws up at least a couple of results even for the most randomly constructed erroneous sentences. I think it's kinda cool...

    BTW, about the puzzle being "all right," well, it was just my opinion. It's got nothing to do with the inherent quality of today's crossword. As it'd have been clear by now, the way I judge crosswords greatly differs from the way experts and formalists do.

    ReplyDelete
  65. My reply at 18:57 was to VJ's previous version of the post and so it's above VJ's post at 19:03.
    Don't know what revisions VJ made but my reply can stand as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Chaturvasi, sorry, I didn't notice your reply.

    The message is pretty much the same. I saw a few errors/ typos and thought I'd correct the same...

    ReplyDelete
  67. Crossword setting is not a set of setters following rules/conventions in a set of books.
    A compiler can make their own rules/conventions but must follow them consistently.

    In the UK, the crossword in say The Herald or The Irish Times (when the late lamented Crosaire was the setter) is/was quite different from other more famous mainstream newspapers.

    I would only expect the definitions to be accurate and the usage of the language above reproach. Trickery can be different but clue sentences must be acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  68. CV,

    So if I understand you correctly,

    1)Whenever a solver starts on a particular setter's puzzles, he can expect to come across rules/conventions which he may not be familiar with.

    2) Assuming consistency is maintained, he/she would become more adept at solving that particular setter's puzzles as time goes by due to his increasing familiarity with the conventions followed.

    3) There are no 'right' or 'wrong' rules/conventions.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Giridhar
    1)Whenever a solver starts on a particular setter's puzzles, he can expect to come across rules/conventions which he may not be familiar with. A: YES.

    2) Assuming consistency is maintained, he/she would become more adept at solving that particular setter's puzzles as time goes by due to his increasing familiarity with the conventions followed. A: YES.

    3) There are no 'right' or 'wrong' rules/conventions. A: Well, the particular setter's crossword cannot be totally unruly. They too must follow the basic rules (there can only be right rules; there cannot be wrong rules) but they can bend these rules ever so slightly (in use of anagram indicators, for example) and solvers will soon get used to them and would know what to expect and how this setter differs from others.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Continuing the dialogue I think NJ has no fixed rules except for some pointers like 'regular' and recently 'out the' for deletion!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Col,

    That's what lead me to raise the questions I did.

    ReplyDelete
  72. "You need not mean what you say, but you must say what you mean". Afrit's golden rule for crossword setting

    ReplyDelete
  73. I am unable what gold has to do in 22ac and Can anyone help me to solve clues as in 31 ac?

    ReplyDelete
  74. Who'll have the last word today? Not me, certainly!

    ReplyDelete
  75. Mangala @ 21:40

    22A - AU and OR are accepted abbreviations for gold in crosswords.

    31A - Release an oriental worker in Channel Islands exactly at eight (10) - {E}{MAN}{CI}{PAT}{E}

    Col's anno is clear enough.

    Oriental = E
    Worker = MAN
    Channel Islands = CI
    exactly = PAT (e.g., 'Pat came the reply')
    Eight = E

    ReplyDelete
  76. Will someone else have the last word, pls?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Obliging Richard's wish.. Just had a thought - NJ does not use much by way of literary references or use definitions that increase our knowledge in areas such as arts or music. Typically in a cryptic crossword, we see at least one reference to for example, works of literature (A Farewell to Arms recently), or general knowledge (plenty of Neyartha clues) or arts and music (I am certain Gridman can provide plenty of examples).. I am sure NJ does clue such answers, but not as a matter of course, I think. That is another minor bone I have to pick on her puzzles - that it does not significantly increase my knowledge of allied topics of general interest, which almost every good cryptic setter that I know strives to provide to his / her solvers.

    ReplyDelete
  78. 80 Not Out - Jaggi-ji's having a great innings today. I wish tomorrow the score will get to a 100.

    ReplyDelete
  79. @LNS: at least one interview that NJ has given to the print media refers to the setter in the feminine...At least, that's what turned up in a suggested Google search of the setter's name a few days ago.

    ReplyDelete
  80. @Veer: Thanks for the info. I've always refered to this personage as 'Jaggi-ji'. The '-ji' suffix, per rules of Hindi grammar known to me is, more or less gender-neutral.

    The Nita's I've known so far are all female. I hope I have not said (or otherwise implied) anywhere that 'Jaggi-ji' is a man. I've always assumed for some reason that 'Jaggi-ji' is a woman. As usual, I'm willing to be corrected on this point.

    Notwithstanding anything I've said above, 'Jaggi-ji' deserves our compliments for facilitating the launching of 82 comments on one day.

    ReplyDelete
  81. @Veer: I was thinking over your comment some more.

    1. I'm going to assume 'Sankalak' is a man on the grounds that this person would have chosen 'Sankalika' as the nickname if indeed the setter was a female.
    2. Like wise, I'm going to assume 'Gridman' is a man on the grounds that this person would have chosen 'Gridwoman' or 'Gridmaanini' as the nickname if indeed the setter was a female.
    3. I do not know what 'Neyartha' means. So I'll park the question of the gender of this setter under 'Open Issues'.

    I'm willing to be corrected on all of the above

    ReplyDelete
  82. @LNS: I did not know the -ji suffix was gender neutral - not having ever spent more than a few days north of Madras in India will sometimes obscure obvious facts like that to culturally challenged folks like myself. I should correct myself, in the few Hindi movies that I have seen, the heroes do deferentially address their mom's as Ma-ji or other ladies by their name-ji. For some reason, Jaggi-ji just sounded masculine. When reading your comment and posting a response the femnine usage did not strike me and I sort of had a foot in mouth attack.. My apologies if I have offended you.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Pondering further on the gender question: Is it possible that in Hindi movies or maybe even in common usage, the name-ji addressing is predominantly used like this:

    1) when addressing women, is it usually first name-ji (Hema-ji or Nita-ji for example)?

    2) when addressing men, is it used both ways: first name-ji (Amitabh-ji) or last name-ji (Sen-ji, Thackeray-ji or Jaggi-ji..)?

    Thanks..

    ReplyDelete
  84. So if your name is Chatterji, you are addressed Chatterjiji ;-). And, if your name is Gigi?

    ReplyDelete
  85. @Gita 05 41 No doubt Gigiji

    ReplyDelete

deepakgita@gmail.com