Wednesday, 18 August 2010

No 9924, Wednesday 18 Aug 10, Sankalak


ACROSS
1   - He stands charged (7) - ACCUSED [E]
5   - Group of stars with small cash and gold, right? (7) - {CENT}{AU}{R}
9   - How does one feel having succeeded in a Himalayan task? (2,3,2,3,5) - ON TOP OF THE WORLD [CD]
10 - Tainted, but claims to be clean (6) - {I'M}{PURE}
11 - A lawyer caught in investigation? Likely (8) - {PROB{A}{BL}E}
13 - Somehow, being a lieutenant is real (8) - TANGIBLE*
15 - Is that how game animals feel? (6) - HUNTED [CD]


18 - Twain hero, wood worker (6) - SAWYER [DD]
19 - Study diplomacy, beginning to seek connections (8) - {CON}{TACT}{S}
22 - Furtively, a master trails one who spreads fear (8) - {A}{LAR{M}IST*}
24 - Utensil that may sometimes fly? (6) - SAUCER [CD]
27 - Inelegant poetry, however, has power in storage (9,6) - POTENTIAL ENERGY*
28 - Send back to the House (2-5) - RE-ELECT [CD]
29 - High growth that a socialist courted without energy (7) - {RED}{WOOeD}
DOWN
1   - Lover in the morning, our time, carries gold (7) - {AM}{OR}{IST}
2   - Very distressed by reduction by state (3,2) - {CUT} {UP}
3   - Exercise control with the best holding device (9) - {SUPER}{VISE}
4   - Defence on time is quick and neat (4) - {DEF}{T}
5   - Stick together with business at this place (6) - {CO}{HERE}
6   - Bachelor, pale, upset by Indian ruler (5) - {NAW}{AB} <-
7   - The kind of work done in the big top (9) - ACROBATIC [CD]


8   - Poisonous oxide that may render dealer dead (3,4) - {RED LEA*}{D}
12 - A pest at home (3) - FLY [CD]
14 - Coal is unlikely to be welcome here (9) - NEWCASTLE [CD]
16 - Being without instruction turned lan off (9) - UNTRAINED*
17 - A task for a patient one (3) - JOB [DD]
18 - Informal photograph by a swimmer (7) - {SNAP}{PER}
20 - Remained to accommodate royalty but got lost (7) - {ST{R}AYED}
21 - Foolish chap, the first to extend help (6) - {ASS}{IST}
23,25 - Gamblers' haven in Monaco (5,5) - MONTE CARLO [E]
26 - An insult in shameless lurid language (4) - SLUR [T]

48 comments:

  1. Hi
    I was feeling HUNTED, but the POTENTIAL ENERGY of the CW put me ON TOP OF THE WORLD. But this did not stop me for goofing up gridless on Orkut. I had put B(ASH)A instead of NAW-AB<- for 6d which might have been acceptable for gridless work but putting AD-HERE for 5d instead of CO-HERE was a boo-boo. Mea culpa.

    It is a SLUR on democracy when we are ACCUSED of RE-ELECTing ALARMIST, IMPURE, UNTRAINED representatives, when they FLY from their JOB, saying that they STRAYED, did political ACROBATICs and saw PROBABLE CENTAURs and TANGIBLE flying SAUCERs in MONTE CARLO and NEWCASTLE (yeah, right, you thought our NAWABs (read MPs) were in India, nope they are abroad developing AMOURIST CONTACTS, DEFT-ly eating CUT UP SNAPPERs, not knowing the difference between REDWOOD and REDLEAD when they should have SUPERVISEd SAWYERs here to ASSIST in conservation of forests ).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good morning everyone

    A nice puzzle.

    ON TOP OF THE WORLD (reminiscent of the Carpenters' hit number), IMPURE, SAWYER, ALARMIST, SAUCER, POTENTIAL ENERGY (neat anagram), RE-ELECT, REDWOOD, NEWCASTLE etc were all good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great cartoons, Deepak. The Hunted one reminded me of WATER-LOO

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some really nice clues today... Surprisingly, a very few anagrams.

    Kishore, 19D CONTACTS... During S&B, Dr. Srinivasan had brought this clue up for discussion. What do you make of it? Was there another guy in the room? Or is it just like the book?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Read Shuchi's blog on "Detectives in Cryptic Clues" (link alongside).

    It seems that for her examples she doesn't usually take recourse to original crosswords from India.

    Here are some clues from THC - though all of them are from my dB of only Gridman's work. (These do use a term or two that don't figure in the examples that she cites.)

    Happenings caused by our sailors and detectives sent abroad (9)

    Hustle about a detective (6)

    Think it's the one under the detective's gaze (7)

    Reportedly, is acquainted with a detective (4)

    Stern detectives return to trap evasive star (7)

    ReplyDelete
  6. IN-CID-ENTS*
    ?
    ?
    NOSE (~KNOWS)
    D(RAST*)IC<-

    ReplyDelete
  7. SLEUTH*

    Well disguised anagram fodder and indiccator

    ReplyDelete
  8. Of the clues that were entered above in the Comments section, only the following remains for a future solver:

    Think it's the one under the detective's gaze (7)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I could solve fully at last.
    I would like to post aposer.
    1.
    My age is,double of what was your age, when I was of your age.
    When you will be of my age, the sum of our ages will be 63.
    What is my age?

    2.

    What is Humayun to the father of Akbar?

    ReplyDelete
  10. The answer to the second one is 'the name'.
    'Humayun'is the name of the father of Akbar.

    ReplyDelete
  11. That is what I meant. Maybe I did not put it properly

    ReplyDelete
  12. Incidently this is the question that comes in the ad for KBC. No question is too small

    ReplyDelete
  13. Talking of relationships: A lady is pushing a pram containing a baby. When asked how she is related to the baby, she replies: The father of this child is the father of the man whose father is my father in law.

    How is the baby related to her ?

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Kishore 1947: The puzzle is related to Visu's puzzle told in 'Samsaram athu Minsaram' - it seems

    ReplyDelete
  15. the baby is hers. reminded of Director Balachandar's movie,apoorva ragangal.

    ReplyDelete
  16. http://www.hindu.com/mp/2010/08/18/stories/2010081850350100.htm

    Link to another interesting nostalgia piece. But I can't believe (see author's bio at the end) that a private individual's library has six lakh books.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sorry, Doctor, you got your gynealogy mixed up.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Subbu, I ain't not seen the film, so can't comment, but you have given no answer.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Nope, Doc, try again.

    Reminds me of the pediatrician who used to look at my two kids when they were small and ask whether they were twins, this after noting down their dates of birth and ages, and continuing to ask this question for the next twenty odd visits.

    ReplyDelete
  20. my last and final try. her BIL's grand child. I Want the answer presto!

    ReplyDelete
  21. these sort of questions always make me sick and I never attempt ,but just tried today and failed miserably .waiting for Kishore to come out with the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Soooooorry for the typo, the correct statement is:
    The father of this child is the father in law of the man whose father is my father in law.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Before the typo it was her husbands sibling and after the correction it is her sibling

    ReplyDelete
  24. Father-in-law has a child???? OMG, this is enough to make me sick.

    ReplyDelete
  25. her sibling, and now I think I need not remind you of your paediatrician.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bingo, Deepak.

    ReplyDelete
  27. And Doc. This time I dont have to quote B Bunny as in What's up, Doc?

    ReplyDelete
  28. VJ, if you are sick, we have at least 2 doctors on the panel...

    ReplyDelete
  29. Father in laws do have children, otherwise they cant become father in laws, not counting adoption..

    ReplyDelete
  30. But a child in a pram? Gimme a break!!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. VJ,
    Why can't the father-in-law have a child? Haven't you seen 'Father of the Bride Part 2'? By the way accidents can always happen. I know people who have had siblings when they themselves were fathers of children. This was especially so in the olden days when there were 15 - 16 children in one family.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yep, I've seen the movie. I think I've seen almost all Steve Martin movies.

    Of course, it can happen. I find it hard to imagine a 50+ guy having a 2 year old kid. Oh no.... it kinda freaks me out.

    ReplyDelete
  33. VJ, relax. anybody can have a child including the FIL. by the way Kishore ,as far I know we have 4 docs ,Dr.Venkatesh, Jaggu,Sumitra and myself to take care of VJ.

    ReplyDelete
  34. LOL, dr Pankajam, I think no doctors or shrinks can help me out here. It's just a personal thing. Ain't nothin' wrong with it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. VJ a full fauj of doctors bidding for you. Gimme a lollipop anyday.

    ReplyDelete
  36. VJ ref by 2019, I already used up today's quota of double neg

    ReplyDelete
  37. I file a petition to increase the quota.

    Even better if it's unlimited.

    ReplyDelete
  38. It aint not fair to do it again...

    ReplyDelete
  39. You can use unlimited number of these, provided you use Boolean Algebra, where 1+1=1, so you can always be in the quota of one. Petition admitted. No order as to costs.

    ReplyDelete
  40. VJ,
    I really enjoyed the emotions you went through for the FIL having a baby.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Doc, talk about sibling rivalry, this is sibling in law rivalry

    ReplyDelete
  42. Dr Pankajam

    Thanks for the vote of confidence.

    Kishore @ 21:54

    Isn't the plural of father-in-law fathers-in-law? In case of brother-in-law, it is brothers-in-law, major-general - majors-general, director general - directors general.

    When you purposely use a wrong spelling, it is evident you are poking fun at someone.

    ReplyDelete
  43. You are right, Venkatesh, just a slip of the keystroke

    ReplyDelete
  44. I dont know anyone here with multiple fathers in law, so I cant be poking fun, and even if I knew, I would not poke fun on this issue

    ReplyDelete
  45. Major General plural is Major Generals and not Majors General So also for Director General

    ReplyDelete
  46. CV @20:14

    PT can be classified as Tamil pulp crime fiction author I suppose. 6 'lakhs' seems a very high number!

    ReplyDelete

deepakgita@gmail.com