ACROSS
1 - He stands charged (7) - ACCUSED [E]
5 - Group of stars with small cash and gold, right? (7) - {CENT}{AU}{R}
9 - How does one feel having succeeded in a Himalayan task? (2,3,2,3,5) - ON TOP OF THE WORLD [CD]
10 - Tainted, but claims to be clean (6) - {I'M}{PURE}
11 - A lawyer caught in investigation? Likely (8) - {PROB{A}{BL}E}
13 - Somehow, being a lieutenant is real (8) - TANGIBLE*
15 - Is that how game animals feel? (6) - HUNTED [CD]
18 - Twain hero, wood worker (6) - SAWYER [DD]
19 - Study diplomacy, beginning to seek connections (8) - {CON}{TACT}{S}
22 - Furtively, a master trails one who spreads fear (8) - {A}{LAR{M}IST*}
24 - Utensil that may sometimes fly? (6) - SAUCER [CD]
27 - Inelegant poetry, however, has power in storage (9,6) - POTENTIAL ENERGY*
28 - Send back to the House (2-5) - RE-ELECT [CD]
29 - High growth that a socialist courted without energy (7) - {RED}{WOO
DOWN
1 - Lover in the morning, our time, carries gold (7) - {AM}{OR}{IST}
2 - Very distressed by reduction by state (3,2) - {CUT} {UP}
3 - Exercise control with the best holding device (9) - {SUPER}{VISE}
4 - Defence on time is quick and neat (4) - {DEF}{T}
5 - Stick together with business at this place (6) - {CO}{HERE}
6 - Bachelor, pale, upset by Indian ruler (5) - {NAW}{AB} <-
7 - The kind of work done in the big top (9) - ACROBATIC [CD]
8 - Poisonous oxide that may render dealer dead (3,4) - {RED LEA*}{D}
12 - A pest at home (3) - FLY [CD]
14 - Coal is unlikely to be welcome here (9) - NEWCASTLE [CD]
16 - Being without instruction turned lan off (9) - UNTRAINED*
17 - A task for a patient one (3) - JOB [DD]
18 - Informal photograph by a swimmer (7) - {SNAP}{PER}
20 - Remained to accommodate royalty but got lost (7) - {ST{R}AYED}
21 - Foolish chap, the first to extend help (6) - {ASS}{IST}
23,25 - Gamblers' haven in Monaco (5,5) - MONTE CARLO [E]
26 - An insult in shameless lurid language (4) - SLUR [T]
Hi
ReplyDeleteI was feeling HUNTED, but the POTENTIAL ENERGY of the CW put me ON TOP OF THE WORLD. But this did not stop me for goofing up gridless on Orkut. I had put B(ASH)A instead of NAW-AB<- for 6d which might have been acceptable for gridless work but putting AD-HERE for 5d instead of CO-HERE was a boo-boo. Mea culpa.
It is a SLUR on democracy when we are ACCUSED of RE-ELECTing ALARMIST, IMPURE, UNTRAINED representatives, when they FLY from their JOB, saying that they STRAYED, did political ACROBATICs and saw PROBABLE CENTAURs and TANGIBLE flying SAUCERs in MONTE CARLO and NEWCASTLE (yeah, right, you thought our NAWABs (read MPs) were in India, nope they are abroad developing AMOURIST CONTACTS, DEFT-ly eating CUT UP SNAPPERs, not knowing the difference between REDWOOD and REDLEAD when they should have SUPERVISEd SAWYERs here to ASSIST in conservation of forests ).
Good morning everyone
ReplyDeleteA nice puzzle.
ON TOP OF THE WORLD (reminiscent of the Carpenters' hit number), IMPURE, SAWYER, ALARMIST, SAUCER, POTENTIAL ENERGY (neat anagram), RE-ELECT, REDWOOD, NEWCASTLE etc were all good.
Great cartoons, Deepak. The Hunted one reminded me of WATER-LOO
ReplyDeleteSome really nice clues today... Surprisingly, a very few anagrams.
ReplyDeleteKishore, 19D CONTACTS... During S&B, Dr. Srinivasan had brought this clue up for discussion. What do you make of it? Was there another guy in the room? Or is it just like the book?
Read Shuchi's blog on "Detectives in Cryptic Clues" (link alongside).
ReplyDeleteIt seems that for her examples she doesn't usually take recourse to original crosswords from India.
Here are some clues from THC - though all of them are from my dB of only Gridman's work. (These do use a term or two that don't figure in the examples that she cites.)
Happenings caused by our sailors and detectives sent abroad (9)
Hustle about a detective (6)
Think it's the one under the detective's gaze (7)
Reportedly, is acquainted with a detective (4)
Stern detectives return to trap evasive star (7)
IN-CID-ENTS*
ReplyDelete?
?
NOSE (~KNOWS)
D(RAST*)IC<-
SLEUTH*
ReplyDeleteWell disguised anagram fodder and indiccator
Of the clues that were entered above in the Comments section, only the following remains for a future solver:
ReplyDeleteThink it's the one under the detective's gaze (7)
SUSPECT ?
ReplyDeleteI could solve fully at last.
ReplyDeleteI would like to post aposer.
1.
My age is,double of what was your age, when I was of your age.
When you will be of my age, the sum of our ages will be 63.
What is my age?
2.
What is Humayun to the father of Akbar?
1 28
ReplyDelete2 himself
The answer to the second one is 'the name'.
ReplyDelete'Humayun'is the name of the father of Akbar.
That is what I meant. Maybe I did not put it properly
ReplyDeleteIncidently this is the question that comes in the ad for KBC. No question is too small
ReplyDeleteTalking of relationships: A lady is pushing a pram containing a baby. When asked how she is related to the baby, she replies: The father of this child is the father of the man whose father is my father in law.
ReplyDeleteHow is the baby related to her ?
@Kishore 1947: The puzzle is related to Visu's puzzle told in 'Samsaram athu Minsaram' - it seems
ReplyDeletethe baby is hers. reminded of Director Balachandar's movie,apoorva ragangal.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.hindu.com/mp/2010/08/18/stories/2010081850350100.htm
ReplyDeleteLink to another interesting nostalgia piece. But I can't believe (see author's bio at the end) that a private individual's library has six lakh books.
Sorry, Doctor, you got your gynealogy mixed up.
ReplyDeleteSubbu, I ain't not seen the film, so can't comment, but you have given no answer.
ReplyDeleteNope, Doc, try again.
ReplyDeleteReminds me of the pediatrician who used to look at my two kids when they were small and ask whether they were twins, this after noting down their dates of birth and ages, and continuing to ask this question for the next twenty odd visits.
my last and final try. her BIL's grand child. I Want the answer presto!
ReplyDeletethese sort of questions always make me sick and I never attempt ,but just tried today and failed miserably .waiting for Kishore to come out with the answer.
ReplyDeleteSoooooorry for the typo, the correct statement is:
ReplyDeleteThe father of this child is the father in law of the man whose father is my father in law.
Before the typo it was her husbands sibling and after the correction it is her sibling
ReplyDeleteFather-in-law has a child???? OMG, this is enough to make me sick.
ReplyDeleteher sibling, and now I think I need not remind you of your paediatrician.
ReplyDeleteBingo, Deepak.
ReplyDeleteAnd Doc. This time I dont have to quote B Bunny as in What's up, Doc?
ReplyDeleteVJ, if you are sick, we have at least 2 doctors on the panel...
ReplyDeleteFather in laws do have children, otherwise they cant become father in laws, not counting adoption..
ReplyDeleteBut a child in a pram? Gimme a break!!!
ReplyDeleteVJ,
ReplyDeleteWhy can't the father-in-law have a child? Haven't you seen 'Father of the Bride Part 2'? By the way accidents can always happen. I know people who have had siblings when they themselves were fathers of children. This was especially so in the olden days when there were 15 - 16 children in one family.
Yep, I've seen the movie. I think I've seen almost all Steve Martin movies.
ReplyDeleteOf course, it can happen. I find it hard to imagine a 50+ guy having a 2 year old kid. Oh no.... it kinda freaks me out.
VJ, relax. anybody can have a child including the FIL. by the way Kishore ,as far I know we have 4 docs ,Dr.Venkatesh, Jaggu,Sumitra and myself to take care of VJ.
ReplyDeleteLOL, dr Pankajam, I think no doctors or shrinks can help me out here. It's just a personal thing. Ain't nothin' wrong with it.
ReplyDeleteVJ a full fauj of doctors bidding for you. Gimme a lollipop anyday.
ReplyDeleteVJ ref by 2019, I already used up today's quota of double neg
ReplyDeleteI file a petition to increase the quota.
ReplyDeleteEven better if it's unlimited.
It aint not fair to do it again...
ReplyDeleteYou can use unlimited number of these, provided you use Boolean Algebra, where 1+1=1, so you can always be in the quota of one. Petition admitted. No order as to costs.
ReplyDeleteVJ,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the emotions you went through for the FIL having a baby.
Doc, talk about sibling rivalry, this is sibling in law rivalry
ReplyDeleteDr Pankajam
ReplyDeleteThanks for the vote of confidence.
Kishore @ 21:54
Isn't the plural of father-in-law fathers-in-law? In case of brother-in-law, it is brothers-in-law, major-general - majors-general, director general - directors general.
When you purposely use a wrong spelling, it is evident you are poking fun at someone.
You are right, Venkatesh, just a slip of the keystroke
ReplyDeleteI dont know anyone here with multiple fathers in law, so I cant be poking fun, and even if I knew, I would not poke fun on this issue
ReplyDeleteMajor General plural is Major Generals and not Majors General So also for Director General
ReplyDeleteCV @20:14
ReplyDeletePT can be classified as Tamil pulp crime fiction author I suppose. 6 'lakhs' seems a very high number!